Apply Biological Medicine to Your Practice — Great Seminar

Angelina Jolie — Wise Call or Insanity?? by Dr. Janey Little

Amazing 16-Year-Old Discovers New Test For Pancreatic Cancer


**** PEMF — Look At The Results

**** Help Your Dentist Test You For Sensitivity

Welcome to this 179th issue of my newsletter.  About 24 months of past issues are available at this website.  Just click on the “Newsletter Archive” link on the left of the screen.  The articles tend to be “timeless,” so read or reread some of them at your leisure.



Apply Biological Medicine to Your Practice — Great Seminar


Are you a medical practitoner who has been interested in applying the principles of “biological medicine” to your practice?  Here’s a great opportunity for you to learn how to do that from some of the “world’s greatest experts.”  Dr. Geoff Drobot, ND and Dr. Dickson Thom, ND of the American Center for Biological Medicine in Scottsdale, Arizona have organized a weekend seminar for you at their clinic in Scottsdale.

Here’s how they describe it:

“This seminar is designed for medical practitioners who have some background in Biological Medicine and are interested in getting a clinical view as to how a Biological Medicine clinic operates and want to go deeper into Biological Medicine on many levels. You will have first -hand experience learning about the science behind the equipment and the business aspect of making Biological Medicine successful in a practice. You will leave with practical tools and a plan to begin implementing Biological Medicine in to your practice step-by-step.”

The dates are September 20th to 22nd.  Registration has started and is limited.  Best to get yours set up now.  Take a look at the two websites below.  Believe me, these two gentlemen and the guest speakers they have invited are the best sources I know of for this information. You’ll be very glad you took advantage of this opportunity.  Sign up now.  Just click on the two websites below for all the detailed information on this great opportunity.

What?  You’re not a doctor?  How about pointing out this great opportunity for learning to the doctor you care about?



Angelina Jolie — Wise Call or Insanity?? by Dr. Janey Little


Here is an article I enjoyed reading from a source, Dr. Janey Little in South Africa, who I greatly admire. She has written it specifically for you, my loyal readers.  I hope you enjoy it as much as I did:

“Tabloid newspapers and magazines have been in a frenzy over the Hollywood actress’ recent revelations of choosing to have a bilateral mastectomy to reduce her risk of breast cancer.  With her high profile in mind, her actions are bound to have far-reaching consequences amongst her millions of followers around the world.  But just how wise was this choice of electing to have this radical surgery performed on an otherwise healthy body?

Angelina was advised by her doctors that because she had been identified as having a mutated BRCA1 gene she stood an 87% risk of getting breast cancer.  If she were to elect to have a bilateral mastectomy, she was advised this would drop to <5%.  Given these statistics, it’s not surprising that she opted to go with surgery.

However digging a little deeper, we find that this figure of 87% actually comes from the company that created the test designed for identifying the BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutated genes and who stand to make millions from this latest spate of publicity.  What is concerning is that this same company whose own profit-driven incentives produced these statistics won’t allow their test results to be verified by other medical laboratories.

According to the ‘Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’ the truth is that only 3-5% of women with breast cancer actually have the mutated BRCA1 gene.  Women should take further heart from the fact that this does not even imply that 3-5% of breast cancer patients have inherited this gene from their parents or grandparents.

The truth is that our environment has an overwhelmingly greater influence on our genes mutating than hereditary factors do.  In fact true inheritance of ‘bad genes’ has been shown to be in the region of <5%, whilst adverse environmental factors contribute a whopping 95%+ to a mutation of genes.

And of course this is great news for us because we have control over these environmental factors in the following ways: 

      A)  We get to choose the type of food we put in our mouth and can opt to avoid those which are likely to be contaminated with hormones, antibiotics, herbicides, pesticides, etc.

     B)  We can educate ourselves on the products we use on our bodies, as well as those in our home environment, avoiding those which contain harmful chemical ingredients and preservatives which are known carcinogens.

     C)  We can learn how to cleanse and detoxify our bodies, which in the process will promote a healthy terrain which has no place for cancer.

     D)  We can also learn to choose our emotional patterns more wisely, a crucial, yet often overlooked factor in contributing to diseases of all types, including cancer.

All these above-mentioned factors have an influence on our cellular terrain and ultimately on the oxygenation of our tissues.  As Dr Otto Warburg (Nobel laureate), and numerous other esteemed doctors and scientists have confirmed, it is a deprivation of oxygen at the cellular level that ultimately cause genes to mutate and cancer cells to form. Therefore when we learn how to address these environmental factors, we also significantly reduce our risk of cancer!

In truth, therefore, when we point to examples of women diagnosed with cancer from more than one generation of a family, and cite that as evidence that breast cancer is hereditary, we are leaping to a false conclusion.  The risk of breast cancer being passed down through the generations is seldom due to true genetic inheritance but rather due to an ‘inheritance’ of similar dietary habits, lifestyle ways and emotional patterns.

Sadly this false conclusion is a serious one.  It leaves many women feeling as though they are helpless victims of their own genetics which in turn has its own dire consequences.  Feeling resigned to the fact that breast cancer is their likely destiny, many women will fail to take action on the multitude of environmental factors that play a significant role in preventing breast cancer.

A further consequence for many women living with the belief that they have a genetic predisposition to getting breast cancer is perhaps even more serious.  When we understand the power of the mind and how we create our own reality by the choice of our thoughts, we realize that women who become convinced of their fate of being diagnosed with breast cancer are inadvertently using their minds in the most detrimental of manners by setting the stage for ultimately creating the reality they fear the most!

And perhaps most sadly of all, we witness the error of elective mastectomies when these women who have undergone this mutilating surgery still succumb to cancer.  Why?  Quite simply because cancer is not about the tumour!  The tumour is merely a symptom and removing the symptom (tumour) or in this case the tissue which will likely inhabit the tumour is missing the point entirely!   The real disease is the lack of oxygen and it is here that we should be placing our focus.

Andreas Moritz perhaps sums it up best on the subject of genes and cancer when he says, ‘Cancer has always been an extremely rare illness except in industrialized nations during the past 40-50 years.  Human genes have not significantly changed for thousands of years.  Why would they change so drastically now, and suddenly decide to kill scores of people?……. any good genetic researcher would tell you that such a belief is void of any logic and outright unscientific.’

In summary, relying on genetics to assess your risk of breast cancer is not only fraught with serious consequences, but it also simply does not live up to scientific scrutiny!

How infinitely better is it to live knowing that you dictate the environmental factors that influence your risk of getting breast cancer (or any other cancer), as opposed to living with the fear that you could become the next victim of a genetic roll of the dice?”

Dr Janey is author of the book, “You Can Heal Yourself From Cancer Now!” and is a full-time “cancer coach” who conducts 1-on-1 coaching in person and by telephone around the world.  She also conducts regular seminars and speaking engagements in her quest to empower individuals everywhere on how to harness their own infinite powers in preventing and healing cancer.

For more information on Dr. Janey and her coaching, go to



Amazing 16-Year-Old Discovers New Test For Pancreatic Cancer 


Want some inspiration?  Take a look at this video.  It’s less than 11 minutes long. Here’s the e-mail I received from Khalid El Khatid describing it:

“Hi Bill, 

As someone that covers the space, I¹m sure you know that over 85 percent of all pancreatic cancers are diagnosed late, when someone has less than a two percent chance of survival. 

I am writing to share a TED Talk that posted today in which Jack Andraka shares how he developed a promising early detection test for pancreatic cancer that¹s super cheap, effective and non-invasive — all before his 16th birthday.  Amazing kid, amazing story.








Some of you have heard of Pulsed Electro-Magnetic Fields (PEMF), as I have.  Drs. Drobot and Thom (see above) use it in their American Center for Biological Medicine in Scottsdale, Arizona.  In fact, all you have to do is type PEMF into Google and you’ll find lots of information on this amazing treatment.

But  have you seen a video which shows clearly the results?  Well, here is one.  In this 7 minute video, a German doctor at Arcadia Clinic in Germany shows you the immediate results of one of his patients treating herself with this device.  It is truly amazing.  Take a look:

This link came from Marcus Freudenmann and his Cancer Is Curable Now newsletter.  Thanks, Marcus.



Many of you I’ve talked to recently are aware of the importance of testing you for sensitivity to dental materials before your dentist adds anything to your mouth.  Simple replacement of mercury fillings, for example, often results in adverse reactions because the dentist did not test you for your sensitivities.  We’re all different.

The “composites” used by dentists to replace mercury amalgam in our teeth all contain metals.  Are you sensitive to them?  Are you sensitive to the metals he/she is about to use for a partial plate, bridge or crown? If your dentist doesn’t test your blood, neither you nor he/she have any way of knowing.

Dr Judy Seeger, ND, sent me a link to a wonderful source for a sensitivity test for all dental materials.  If your dentist doesn’t know of this lab and its ability to protect you from doing more harm than good with dental work, please let him/her know and insist on having a test like this done before you get anything added to what’s in your mouth. Here’s the website:


Do your friends a favor and send them to my website:

Be well…and be sure to hug each other every day and lay your burdens down tonight!

Bill Henderson

Author, “Cure Your Cancer” and “Cancer-Free”S


“How to Live Cancer-Free”

Listen anytime.


Although many alternative medical treatments have been successfully used for many years, they are currently not practiced by conventional medicine and are therefore not “approved” and legal (in some States) for medical professionals to prescribe for their patients, although it is legal for individuals to use them at their own discretion. It therefore becomes necessary to include the following disclaimer:

The offerings made by this publication are to be carefully considered by the user. All responsibility regarding the use of alternative treatments rests with the patient. If you have doubts regarding these things, rely on your conventional doctor.